Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Biofortuna Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBiofortuna Limited(You)LGC LimitedUNIVERSITY OF BATH (THE)EDINBURGH GENETICS LIMITEDSciensanoCharles River Laboratories
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | LG LGC Limited Peer · rank #1 | UO UNIVERSITY OF BATH (THE) Peer · rank #2 | BI Biofortuna Limited (You) · target supplier | EG EDINBURGH GENETICS LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | SC Sciensano Peer · rank #5 | CR Charles River Laboratories Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £646k | £14k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £560.1m | £18.5m | £90k(−95%) | £1.7m | £535k | £592k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —