Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MTS Plant stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMTS Plant(You)Costain LtdJohn Graham Construction LimitedESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDTrading as GRAHAMC R Reynolds Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CO Costain Ltd Peer · rank #1 | JG John Graham Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TA Trading as GRAHAM Peer · rank #4 | CR C R Reynolds Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MP MTS Plant (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.1bn | £303.5m | £56.6m | £29.4m | £21.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £71.8m | £1.9m | £1.0m | £1.9m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.9bn | £4.1bn | £1.5bn | £102.6m | £265.4m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 18 | 17 | 31 | 4 | 12 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —