Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AMANDA MCMURRAY LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAMANDA MCMURRAY LIMITED(You)ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDSopra Steria LimitedChannel 3 Consulting LimitedREAL Consulting (Cost and Project management) LLPCravencroft Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SS Sopra Steria Limited Peer · rank #2 | C3 Channel 3 Consulting Limited Peer · rank #3 | AM AMANDA MCMURRAY LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RC REAL Consulting (Cost and Project management) LLP Peer · rank #5 | CR Cravencroft Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £291.0m | £29.2m | £1.1m | £81k(−99%) | £47k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £703k | — | — | £4k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £5.4bn | £1.2bn | £26.3m | £999k(−96%) | £291k | £4.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 24 | 9 | 6 | 18(+140%) | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —