Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M & M CONTRACTORS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM & M CONTRACTORS LIMITED(You)Lister WilderGlendale Countryside LtdCONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITEDJDB ContractorsGUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #1 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #2 | M& M & M CONTRACTORS LIMITED (You) · target supplier | CL CONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | JC JDB Contractors Peer · rank #5 | GB GUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.3m | £641k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £174k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £31.1m | £180.4m | £756k(−98%) | £98.8m | £15.5m | £15.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 16 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —