Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SWAN ADVOCACY NETWORK stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortSWAN ADVOCACY NETWORK(You)St Christopher’s FellowshipFOSTER CARE LINK LIMITEDOptima Health UK LimitedSchool-Led Development TrustAmbition Institute
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SC St Christopher’s Fellowship Peer · rank #1 | FC FOSTER CARE LINK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OH Optima Health UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | SD School-Led Development Trust Peer · rank #4 | AI Ambition Institute Peer · rank #5 | SA SWAN ADVOCACY NETWORK (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £59.0m | £59.0m | £29.6m | £11.6m | £9.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £81.4m | £71.9m | £44.2m | £170.2m | £31.3m | £5.7m(−92%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —