Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Greenspan stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGreenspan(You)Greenspan Projects LtdSport and Leisure ManagementUrbanCrazy (Mobile) LtdDobsons UK LtdGrassplant Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GP Greenspan Projects Ltd Peer · rank #1 | GR Greenspan (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #3 | U( UrbanCrazy (Mobile) Ltd Peer · rank #4 | DU Dobsons UK Ltd Peer · rank #5 | GR Grassplant Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £782k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £83k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £6.1m | £323k(+13%) | £379.1m | £285k | £157k | £107k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —