Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MPM stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMPM(You)AECOM LIMITEDConstellia Public LimitedNext Energy Solutions LtdHARMONY FIRE LIMITEDKier Integrated Services
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CP Constellia Public Limited Peer · rank #2 | NE Next Energy Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HF HARMONY FIRE LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #5 | MP MPM (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.5m | £36.9m | £9.7m | £7.9m | £3.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £275k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £600.3m | £250.1m | £409.2m | £1.7bn | £181k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 129 | 4 | 11 | 8 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —