Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MICKLEDORE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMICKLEDORE LIMITED(You)ERNST & YOUNG LLPUCL Consultants LtdInner Circle Consulting LimitedPRIVATE PUBLIC LTDRedesmere Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #1 | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #2 | IC Inner Circle Consulting Limited Peer · rank #3 | PP PRIVATE PUBLIC LTD Peer · rank #4 | RE Redesmere Limited Peer · rank #5 | MI MICKLEDORE LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £49.2m | £7.1m | £6.8m | £3.8m | £832k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.4m | — | — | £2.4m | £5.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.7bn | £49.5m | £18.7m | £25.1m | £32.1m | £440k(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 55 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —