Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Crosby Ferguson & Medcalf Ltd (appointed to Lot 1) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCrosby Ferguson & Medcalf Ltd (appointed to Lot 1)(You)Wates Construction LimitedGalliford Try Construction LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITEDPellings LLP
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AL ALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #5 | CF Crosby Ferguson & Medcalf Ltd (appointed to Lot 1) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £251.9m | £189.7m | £59.0m | £14.7m | £1.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32.8m | — | £22k | — | — | £2.4m(−85%) |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £7.1bn | £1.9bn | £1.5bn | £90.5m | £148.4m | £20.2m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 20 | 11 | 75 | 11 | 4 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —