Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How S J Danby Ltd T/A Playscheme stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 15 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortS J Danby Ltd T/A Playscheme(You)NEVADA CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDCore Control SolutionInterclass Holdings LtdTriton Construction Limited
iAuto-picked from 15 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | NC NEVADA CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SJ S J Danby Ltd T/A Playscheme (You) · target supplier | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CC Core Control Solution Peer · rank #4 | IH Interclass Holdings Ltd Peer · rank #5 | TC Triton Construction Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £15.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £121.8m | £18.8m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £28.7m | £1.5m(−95%) | £121.8m | £46.4m | £3.6m | £8.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | — | 5 | 1 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —