Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Net World Sports stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Wales.
Value band:
/
CohortNet World Sports(You)KOMPAN LtdWicksteed Leisure LtdEIBEPLAY LIMITEDJupiter Play and Leisure LtdPENTAGON SPORT LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KO KOMPAN Ltd Peer · rank #1 | WL Wicksteed Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #2 | NW Net World Sports (You) · target supplier | EI EIBEPLAY LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | JP Jupiter Play and Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #5 | PS PENTAGON SPORT LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.9m | £1.1m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £207k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £64.8m | £25.1m | £2.2m(−81%) | £11.5m | £10.0m | £6.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 24 | — | 6 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —