Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Consortia Integrated Services Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortConsortia Integrated Services Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionBAM Building and InfrastructureALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITEDDSM Demolition LimitedCompass Developments (NE) Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | BB BAM Building and Infrastructure Peer · rank #2 | AS ALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | DD DSM Demolition Limited Peer · rank #4 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #5 | CI Consortia Integrated Services Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £55.0m | £6.2m | £1.3m | £663k | £177k(−97%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £909k | £2.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £77.1m | £60.3m | £102.6m | £72.2m | £34.0m(−56%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —