Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cadenza Associates t/a Trish Brady stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCadenza Associates t/a Trish Brady(You)Deloitte LLPThe London Community FoundationMCKINSEY & COMPANY LME LIMITEDInc. United KingdomChemonics Group UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | TL The London Community Foundation Peer · rank #2 | M& MCKINSEY & COMPANY LME LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IU Inc. United Kingdom Peer · rank #4 | CA Cadenza Associates t/a Trish Brady (You) · target supplier | CG Chemonics Group UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £158.5m | £29.4m | £777k | £665k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £29.4m | £201.1m | £68.4m | — | £13.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 93 | 1 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —