Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cognizant Worldwide Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortCognizant Worldwide Ltd(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCPhoenix Software LimitedQUANTEXA LIMITEDCACI LIMITEDMethods Business & Digital Technology Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CW Cognizant Worldwide Ltd (You) · target supplier | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | MB Methods Business & Digital Technology Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £294.1m | £175.0m | £131.9m(−25%) | £47.5m | £16.2m |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £471k | — | £703k(−97%) | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £3.7bn | £186.4m | £907.5m(+387%) | £158.4m | £27.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 220 | 1 | 22(−27%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —