Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How RED KITE CONSERVATION SERVICES LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRED KITE CONSERVATION SERVICES LTD(You)Glendale Countryside LtdPluxee UK LtdCONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITEDJDB Contractors & Son LtdGUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PU Pluxee UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | RK RED KITE CONSERVATION SERVICES LTD (You) · target supplier | CL CONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | JC JDB Contractors & Son Ltd Peer · rank #5 | GB GUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641k | £536k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £174k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £180.4m | £23.3m | £2.0m(−91%) | £98.8m | £15.9m | £15.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 4 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —