Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Accuro Transcriptions Solutions stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortAccuro Transcriptions Solutions(You)SoftcatEQUANS SERVICES LIMITEDCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDAtosMicrosoft Limited
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | ES EQUANS SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AT Atos Peer · rank #4 | MI Microsoft Limited Peer · rank #5 | AT Accuro Transcriptions Solutions (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £466.7m | £118.1m | £95.9m | £76.9m | £13.6m | £41k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.1m | — | £7.5m | £1.2m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £302.1m | £1.5bn | £6.3bn | £466.6m | £70k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 482 | 2 | 85 | 12 | 33 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —