Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NORR Consultants Limited (appointed to Lots 3 and 4) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North East.
Value band:
/
CohortNORR Consultants Limited (appointed to Lots 3 and 4)(You)AECOM LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdJohn Sisk and Son LtdLeica Microsystems (UK) LimitedDREES & SOMMER UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | LM Leica Microsystems (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | D& DREES & SOMMER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | NC NORR Consultants Limited (appointed to Lots 3 and 4) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £41.7m | £4.6m | £3.3m | £737k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | £143k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £522.7m | £271.7m | £54.7m | £37.5m | £12.0m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 27 | 1 | 17 | 13 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —