Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Chrysalis Rail Services Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortChrysalis Rail Services Limited(You)DFP Services LtdArlington Fleet Services LtdMillenium Site Services (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DS DFP Services Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CR Chrysalis Rail Services Limited (You) · target supplier | AF Arlington Fleet Services Ltd Peer · rank #3 | MS Millenium Site Services (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £20k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £109.0m | — | £5.3m | £526k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 1 | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 120 | 4(0%) | 4 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —