Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WM Reply Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortWM Reply Ltd(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCPhoenix Software LimitedQUANTEXA LIMITEDOracle Corporation UK LimitedMethods Business & Digital Technology Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | MB Methods Business & Digital Technology Ltd Peer · rank #5 | WR WM Reply Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £293.8m | £175.0m | £149.4m | £16.2m | £892k(−99%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £471k | — | £2.6m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £3.7bn | £186.4m | £987.3m | £27.4m | £1.3m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 219 | 1 | 70 | 2 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —