Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Environmental Husbandry stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortEnvironmental Husbandry(You)Waterman Aspen LimitedID VerdeConnick Tree Services Ltdarborforce group limitedMM Enviro ltd
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WA Waterman Aspen Limited Peer · rank #1 | EH Environmental Husbandry (You) · target supplier | IV ID Verde Peer · rank #3 | CT Connick Tree Services Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AG arborforce group limited Peer · rank #5 | ME MM Enviro ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.9m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £28k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £34.9m | £667k(−81%) | £3.5m | £9.1m | £2.9m | £1.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 76 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —