Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Katnic stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKatnic(You)Medequip Assistive Technology LtdBECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITEDCEPHEID UK LIMITEDField Management IrelandMountfield Services
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #1 | BC BECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CU CEPHEID UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | KA Katnic (You) · target supplier | FM Field Management Ireland Peer · rank #5 | MS Mountfield Services Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £8.5m | £941k | £817k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | £60k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £822.4m | £204.9m | £84.0m | £2.9m(−97%) | £720k | £1.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 7 | 10 | 1(−85%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —