Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How OSBORNE THOMAS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortOSBORNE THOMAS LIMITED(You)Alexander Mann SolutionsSAP UK LtdCOMENSURA LIMITEDMatrix SCM LimitedReed Specialist Recrutiment
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AM Alexander Mann Solutions Peer · rank #1 | SU SAP UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CO COMENSURA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #4 | OT OSBORNE THOMAS LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RS Reed Specialist Recrutiment Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.6bn | £293.6m | £175.1m | £19.5m | £550k(−100%) | £161k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.1m | — | £108.0m | £125k | £150k(−98%) | £43k |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £24.4bn | £802.5m | £3.0bn | £1.7bn | £21.9m(−99%) | £36.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 34 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 5(−50%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —