Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MTM Youth Services CIC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMTM Youth Services CIC(You)Connections Care LtdAction For Children Services LimitedWest HouseArchangel Enterprises LimitedDDM Health Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC Connections Care Ltd Peer · rank #1 | MY MTM Youth Services CIC (You) · target supplier | AF Action For Children Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | WH West House Peer · rank #4 | AE Archangel Enterprises Limited Peer · rank #5 | DH DDM Health Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.4m | — | £109.5m | £2.7m | £4.2m | £3.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —