Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Tranter McManus Architects stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTranter McManus Architects(You)AECOM LIMITEDMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDArcadis Consulting (UK) LimitedAtkinsRéalis Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AC Arcadis Consulting (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | AT AtkinsRéalis Limited Peer · rank #5 | TM Tranter McManus Architects (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.9m | £58.7m | £518k | £242k | £132k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £22k | £3.2m | £3.1m | £3.2m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £1.2bn | £13.0m | £13.1m | £46.2m | £61k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 145 | 80 | 8 | 5 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —