Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nu Nano Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNu Nano Ltd(You)KPMG LLPMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDTHE GROWTH COMPANY LIMITEDBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustKeele University
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | TG THE GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | NN Nu Nano Ltd (You) · target supplier | BA | KU Keele University Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £314.7m | £59.1m | £91k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £40.1m | £22k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.8bn | £1.2bn | £456.4m | £30k(−100%) | £103.6m | £64.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 92 | 83 | 11 | — | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —