Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How G & S TRAVEL LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortG & S TRAVEL LIMITED(You)Alexander Dennistrading as WrightbusBamford Bus Company LtdMetrolineLondon United
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AD Alexander Dennis Peer · rank #1 | TA trading as Wrightbus Peer · rank #2 | BB Bamford Bus Company Ltd Peer · rank #3 | G& G & S TRAVEL LIMITED (You) · target supplier | ME Metroline Peer · rank #5 | LU London United Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £51.2m | £47.6m | £47.6m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £160.9m | £47.6m | £56.2m | — | £181.7m | £156.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2(−33%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —