Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How A L F PLANT LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: East Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortA L F PLANT LTD(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDKIELY BROS. LIMITEDAebi SchmidtBucher Municipal LtdCONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | KB KIELY BROS. LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AS Aebi Schmidt Peer · rank #3 | BM Bucher Municipal Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CC CONNOR CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH WEST) LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | AL A L F PLANT LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £56.6m | £7.6m | £4.0m | £3.1m | £403k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £433.6m | £144.3m | £74.3m | £62.1m | £2.3m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 21 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —