Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MAGNETICAL stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMAGNETICAL(You)PROMAR INTERNATIONALSANDHILLS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY LIMITEDCravencroft LtdBEOBACHT LIMITEDBLACK KITE LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PI PROMAR INTERNATIONAL Peer · rank #1 | SM SANDHILLS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MA MAGNETICAL (You) · target supplier | CR Cravencroft Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BE BEOBACHT LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | BK BLACK KITE LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £386k | £106k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £54k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £23.3m | £1.4m | £80k(−94%) | £4.6m | £1.2m | £656k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 27 | 19 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —