Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How GP STRATEGIES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGP STRATEGIES LIMITED(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCKPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedQUANTEXA LIMITEDCognizant Worldwide Ltd
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | QU QUANTEXA LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CW Cognizant Worldwide Ltd Peer · rank #5 | GS GP STRATEGIES LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £324.7m | £282.5m | £175.0m | £132.1m | £800k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £44.5m | £494k | — | £703k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £186.4m | £907.5m | £29.0m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 98 | 223 | 1 | 23 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —