Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Future Directions CIC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortFuture Directions CIC(You)UCL Consultants LtdSchool-Led Development TrustAmbition InstituteEducation Development TrustTEACH FIRST
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SD School-Led Development Trust Peer · rank #2 | AI Ambition Institute Peer · rank #3 | ED Education Development Trust Peer · rank #4 | TF TEACH FIRST Peer · rank #5 | FD Future Directions CIC (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £16.4m | £11.6m | £9.7m | £8.7m | £8.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £58.8m | £170.2m | £31.3m | £8.7m | £307.5m | £4.0m(−93%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —