Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Birmingham Sport and Physical Activity Trust stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBirmingham Sport and Physical Activity Trust(You)SERICCOxford Health NHS Foundation TrustIce Creates LimitedTorbay Community Development TrustGrandparents Plus (Kinship)
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BS Birmingham Sport and Physical Activity Trust (You) · target supplier | SE SERICC Peer · rank #2 | OH Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust Peer · rank #3 | IC Ice Creates Limited Peer · rank #4 | TC Torbay Community Development Trust Peer · rank #5 | GP Grandparents Plus (Kinship) Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | — | £9.7m | £117.4m | £25.1m | £3.9m | £1.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —