Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How XPS Pensions Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortXPS Pensions Group(You)AtosAllpay LimitedTyne and Wear Pension FundHeywood LtdEquiniti Limited
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AT Atos Peer · rank #1 | AL Allpay Limited Peer · rank #2 | XP XPS Pensions Group (You) · target supplier | TA Tyne and Wear Pension Fund Peer · rank #4 | HE Heywood Ltd Peer · rank #5 | EQ Equiniti Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £76.9m | £11.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £6.3bn | £210.9m | £2.0m(−93%) | £7.9m | £29.2m | £12.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 39 | — | — | 2 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —