Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ES Global stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 17 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortES Global(You)Tetra Tech LimitedPREMIER MODULAR LIMITEDPORTAKABIN LIMITEDMarlborough Highways LimitedCarlisle Security Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 17 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT Tetra Tech Limited Peer · rank #1 | PM PREMIER MODULAR LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PO PORTAKABIN LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | EG ES Global (You) · target supplier | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | CS Carlisle Security Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.4m | £6.3m | £5.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £53k | — | £505k | — | — | £24.0m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £211.4m | £113.9m | £704.4m | £24.4m(−88%) | £451.1m | £88.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 57 | 4 | 14 | — | 1 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —