Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Conway Aecom stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortConway Aecom(You)Kingfisher LightingRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedVolkerHighways LtdMilestone Infrastructure LimitedLighting & Signs Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KL Kingfisher Lighting Peer · rank #1 | CA Conway Aecom (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | VO VolkerHighways Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MI Milestone Infrastructure Limited Peer · rank #5 | L& Lighting & Signs Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £168k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £2.0bn | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £19.3m | £600k(−100%) | £4.8bn | £391.3m | £1.7bn | £22.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | 1 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —