Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rooster Punk Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRooster Punk Ltd(You)ERNST & YOUNG LLPWAVEMAKER LIMITEDManning Gottlieb OMDEssenceMediacom Holdings LtdInternational Management Group (UK) LTD
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #1 | WA WAVEMAKER LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MG Manning Gottlieb OMD Peer · rank #3 | EH EssenceMediacom Holdings Ltd Peer · rank #4 | RP Rooster Punk Ltd (You) · target supplier | IM International Management Group (UK) LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £106.7m | £51.0m | £25.4m | £990k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.4m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £225.7m | £637.1m | £990k | £36k(−100%) | £4.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 61 | 26 | 4 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —