Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Manchester Printer Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortManchester Printer Group(You)LYRECO UK LIMITEDBanner LimitedBATES OFFICE SERVICES LTDWightman and Parrish LimitedAPS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BA Banner Limited Peer · rank #2 | BO BATES OFFICE SERVICES LTD Peer · rank #3 | WA Wightman and Parrish Limited Peer · rank #4 | MP Manchester Printer Group (You) · target supplier | AG APS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.6m | £3.8m | £3.1m | £500k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £358.1m | £56.9m | £427.4m | £52.2m | £2.7m(−95%) | £56.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 34 | 4 | 25 | 2 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —