Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Andrew G Podmore & Son Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAndrew G Podmore & Son Limited(You)GRESHAM OFFICE FURNITURE LIMITEDFURNITURE RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITEDPRENAX LIMITEDShowcase PSR PortsdownSENATOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (t/a Teal Furniture)
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GO GRESHAM OFFICE FURNITURE LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | FR FURNITURE RESOURCE CENTRE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PR PRENAX LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | SP Showcase PSR Portsdown Peer · rank #4 | SI SENATOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (t/a Teal Furniture) Peer · rank #5 | AG Andrew G Podmore & Son Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.3m | £6.1m | £3.7m | £2.2m | £1.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £750k | — | — | — | £750k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £205.7m | £139.7m | £13.0m | £13.0m | £199.2m | £56k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 7 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —