Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Essentic Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortEssentic Limited(You)PUBLIC DIGITAL LIMITEDThe Activation Project CICInspire SuffolkEmma Wells TennisPotential Project UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PD PUBLIC DIGITAL LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | ES Essentic Limited (You) · target supplier | TA The Activation Project CIC Peer · rank #3 | IS Inspire Suffolk Peer · rank #4 | EW Emma Wells Tennis Peer · rank #5 | PP Potential Project UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.2m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £18.0m | £13k(−99%) | £1.9m | £1.3m | £700k | £698k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | — | — | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —