Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How global mine design stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortglobal mine design(You)Ridge and Partners LLPFrankham Consultancy Group LimitedCalfordSeadenAIREY MILLER LIMITEDWT Partnership
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | RA Ridge and Partners LLP Peer · rank #1 | FC Frankham Consultancy Group Limited Peer · rank #2 | CA CalfordSeaden Peer · rank #3 | AM AIREY MILLER LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GM global mine design (You) · target supplier | WP WT Partnership Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.2m | £7.1m | £3.0m | £2.6m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £59k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £208.9m | £101.9m | £152.6m | £116.1m | — | £69.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 7 | 10 | 6 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —