Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How o2h stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohorto2h(You)OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAMFRONTIER ECONOMICS LIMITEDDigi2al LtdTokamak Energy Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | UO UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM Peer · rank #2 | FE FRONTIER ECONOMICS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | DI Digi2al Ltd Peer · rank #4 | O2 o2h (You) · target supplier | TE Tokamak Energy Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £79.4m | £5.9m | £1.9m | £420k | £242k(−94%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.9m | £245k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £536.1m | £153.0m | £36.5m | £175.0m | £242k(−100%) | £3.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 122 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 1(−90%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —