Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HMA stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHMA(You)SoftcatACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDPhoenix Software LimitedTrustmarque Solutions LtdAccess UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | TS Trustmarque Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #4 | AU Access UK Limited Peer · rank #5 | HM HMA (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £469.7m | £292.8m | £287.1m | £83.8m | £26.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £105.5m | £703k | £275k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £5.6bn | £3.7bn | £83.8m | £156.5m | £50k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 490 | 28 | 221 | 4 | 39 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —