Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Supporting Young Futures Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSupporting Young Futures Limited(You)Victim SupportKelwel Care LimitedOne YMCACentrepoint SohoCamarinal Holdings
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | VS Victim Support Peer · rank #1 | KC Kelwel Care Limited Peer · rank #2 | SY Supporting Young Futures Limited (You) · target supplier | OY One YMCA Peer · rank #4 | CS Centrepoint Soho Peer · rank #5 | CH Camarinal Holdings Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £29.3m | £16.9m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £172.2m | £17.2m | — | £66.9m | £46.6m | £7.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 1 | — | — | 7 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —