Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ctrl O stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortCtrl O(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatACCENTURE (UK) LIMITEDCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDTRUSTMARQUE SOLUTIONS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | A( ACCENTURE (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TS TRUSTMARQUE SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CO Ctrl O (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £516.5m | £443.8m | £291.0m | £106.6m | £73.4m | £491k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £48.3m | £703k | £7.5m | £204k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £5.4bn | £1.4bn | £1.1bn | £1.7m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 463 | 24 | 96 | 37 | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —