Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Achieving for Children CIC stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAchieving for Children CIC(You)KPMG LLPAECOM LIMITEDCOMENSURA LIMITEDMatrix SCM LimitedGI Recruitment Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CO COMENSURA LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #4 | AF Achieving for Children CIC (You) · target supplier | GR GI Recruitment Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £219.5m | £175.1m | £19.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £4.8m | £108.0m | £125k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £827.8m | £3.0bn | £1.7bn | £43k(−100%) | £298.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 132 | 9 | 10 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —