Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Mike Curtis Reward Solutions Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortMike Curtis Reward Solutions Limited(You)Deloitte LLPPA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDReed Talent Solutions LimitedERNST & YOUNG LLPBaringa Partners LLP
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | RT Reed Talent Solutions Limited Peer · rank #3 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #4 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #5 | MC Mike Curtis Reward Solutions Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £418.6m | £308.8m | £153.5m | £106.6m | £20.8m | £42k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £12.0m | £11.7m | — | £5.4m | £21.2m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £1.8bn | £318.8m | £1.8bn | £167.0m | £749k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 88 | 55 | 14 | 60 | 25 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —