Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Citibank N.A stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCitibank N.A(You)SoftcatNational Westminster BankAtosLloyds Banking Groupi-movo Ltd
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | NW National Westminster Bank Peer · rank #2 | AT Atos Peer · rank #3 | LB Lloyds Banking Group Peer · rank #4 | CN Citibank N.A (You) · target supplier | I- i-movo Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £168.7m | £87.7m | £5.0m | £83k(−100%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | — | £35k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £228.8m | £6.3bn | £60.0m | £688k(−100%) | £30.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 1(−88%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —