Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Utility Results Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUtility Results Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedARCADIS CONSULTING UK LTDMott MadDonaldBaily Garner
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | AC ARCADIS CONSULTING UK LTD Peer · rank #3 | MM Mott MadDonald Peer · rank #4 | BG Baily Garner Peer · rank #5 | UR Utility Results Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.7m | £89.7m | £76.7m | £6.8m | £2.1m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £731k | £706k | £47k | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £828.0m | £2.1bn | £316.7m | £25.8m | £138.1m | £285k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 136 | 171 | 91 | 19 | 12 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —