Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Greyskies Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGreyskies Limited(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDConstellia Public LimitedTURNER and TOWNSEND COST MANAGEMENT LIMITEDConstellia LtdPAGABO LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CP Constellia Public Limited Peer · rank #2 | TA TURNER and TOWNSEND COST MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | CO Constellia Ltd Peer · rank #4 | GR Greyskies Limited (You) · target supplier | PA PAGABO LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £332.8m | £36.9m | £19.9m | £474k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £275k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £600.3m | £66.0m | £406.5m | £37k(−100%) | £75.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 57 | 129 | 9 | 5 | — | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —