Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Aurexia stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortAurexia(You)KPMG LLPAtosMace Consult LimitedSSCLNewton Europe Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | AT Atos Peer · rank #2 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #3 | AU Aurexia (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #5 | NE Newton Europe Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £87.7m | £70.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £35k | £2.6m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £6.3bn | £738.3m | £1.4m(−100%) | £159.4m | £97.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 10 | 15 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —