Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Community Resource Planning stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCommunity Resource Planning(You)AECOM LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdPerfect Circle JV LtdArupSTANTEC UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PC Perfect Circle JV Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AR Arup Peer · rank #4 | SU STANTEC UK LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CR Community Resource Planning (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £48.5m | £39.3m | £1.7m | £1.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £264k | £5.5m | £1.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.0m | £1.4bn | £1.3bn | £209.6m | £115.4m | £39k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 137 | 83 | 15 | 11 | 26 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —